As apps become more lucrative than music, no wonder iTunes is projected to rake in a cool $6 billion in the combined 2011 music and app revenues. Be that as it may, Apple’s content store has seen little success in digital publishing due to a conflict of interests which is causing significant friction between Apple and publishers. In fact, Apple is under heightened pressure to loosen up its tight control over digital newspapers and magazines on iPad. Reuters reports:
Without “key concessions”, these publishers will not sell their digital magazines and newspapers on the Newsstand, Apple’s upcoming digital kiosk launching soon with iOS 5. Moreover, the French publications have a digital newsstand of their own which they will use to push digital editions, subscriptions and bundled offers to iPad owners. This comment from Le Figaro executive Pascale Pouquet caught our attention:
So publishers would rather “lose some sales” than make some money on iTunes? That’s a weird strategy. Print people should know better and remember that Apple generally does not budge to pressure. Pouquet’s school of thought brings to mind the following Steve Jobs comment on monetizing news made at last year’s D8 conference at Rancho Palos Verdes, California:
Granter, the uniform, low price approach did work in music, but it’s not striking chord with print die-hards, most of whom are stuck in the old ways. In any case, a growing disconnect between the print folks and Apple will test the company’s practice to impose its thirty percent cut on all items its content partners sell in iTunes. Now, some people warn Apple is at a disadvantage because media mogul Jobs personally cut crucial media deals with content owners. While that may have been the case, there’s now a new guy at Apple to talk to content industries…
Apple CEO Tim Cook last month appointed Cue the boss of iCloud, content and services. The promotion put Cue directly in charge of Apple’s big hit content stores, including the iTunes Store, App Store and iBookstore. Apple for a long time had a love-hate relationship with the movers and shakers in such verticals as music and Hollywood. Over years, however, the company has become more flexible in its dealings with record labels and TV moguls. That cannot be said for the publishing industry, which is still at odds with Apple’s tough terms that seek to impose a uniform thirty percent cut on just about any content sold on iTunes, including magazines, newspapers, subscriptions and other content sold in-app. Apple did back a bit by allowing subscriptions outside the App Store, but in the end the results remained lackluster. Some publishers abandoned App Store altogether as headlines screamed anti-trust issues. Others dodged rules with web apps, like Financial Times, only to see their native apps swiftly removed from the App Store. Meanwhile, some of the smaller publishers such as BeamItDown Software had no choice but to shut down operations as a result of Apple’s 30 percent cut. Of course, those with greater resources at their disposal cut special deals with the Cupertino, California firm.
